Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindrise (NGO)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under WP:CSD. —usernamekiran (talk) 10:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Hindrise (NGO)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looplips (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Looplips (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete shameless advertisement, G11 applies.  Java Hurricane  06:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Aside from the Youtube videos and registration as a welfare organisation in different states in India, there is strong coverage of their work as a welfare organisation serving the needy, particularly in times of Covid-19. The article can get an improve-written-like-advertisement tag. Ipso facto, this is an NGO doing community service and some references support this strongly. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , I'd say this is in such a bad state that WP:TNT is the best course from here. They may be notable, but in this state cleanup is really nothing other than deletion.  Java Hurricane  13:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep. No reason has been given for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 13:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 19:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * deleting WP:G11. Attempted rescue by creator not successful. Attempted rescue by me not successful. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk )
 * Comment. Why was this article deleted while the proceedings of the AfD have not been completed? - please can you explain? Ktin (talk) 01:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Because it was tagged for and deleted as meeting WP:G11. WP:CSD does not require an AfD. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 01:37, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , goes without saying that an AfD should not have been opened. If opened, the article should not have been deleted before the AfD has run its course, even if it means a procedural consensus and closure of the AfD. The current approach has been disrespectful of participants time. Ktin (talk) 01:55, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Never saw promotional keep arguments like " an NGO doing community service" in an AfD before. Such are not exempt from WP:g11 just because the subject serves a noble cause. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 01:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, no. Articles that meet CSD can be deleted under CSD despite the AfD. Feel free to appeal at WP:DRV, though you might want to see what the closing admin decides. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 02:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , while this might be water under the bridge, I will continue to expect better from you as an Administrator. Ktin (talk) 02:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.