Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu (Culture)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy d elete as edits by a banned user (CSD G5). - Mailer Diablo 10:42, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Hindu (Culture)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Despite its name, the article is just a POV fork/original research/personal essay created and edited by three suspected socks of Maleabroad (namely Summam, TypeEditor1 and Abcde0) after previous sustained attempts (by other socks of the user) to insert similar text in Hindu article were rejected (see for example). FYI, this blocked user has created similar POV fork articles before; see for example,. Abecedare 03:16, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per nominator. /Blaxthos 09:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * delete as a POV fork --Apyule 13:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * delete and userfy, this fails WP:CITE at the very least, and as such has to be assumed to be WP:OR, but in theory the author may be able to salvage some of this for another article. The problem here is that the title is most certainly of an encyclopedic subject so redirect to Culture of India (which is where Hindu culture currently redirects as well). -Markeer 14:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 14:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. This is not the first time this tactic has been used via sockpuppets of Maleabroad, see also . Gouranga(UK) 20:32, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I know that Hindu would deserve to have an article about its culture but considering it is POV and it is made by a sock, I opt for the delete. Maybe if someone can start up an article that makes more sense and more NPOV, it would be much better.--JForget 00:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, then recreate as a redirect to Culture of India as suggested by Markeer. Or just make it a redirect, I guess the text is already in the wiki database about a thousand times thanks to the revert warring this user indulges in. Orpheus 08:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.