Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hip-hop magazines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If the references, found not to support the article, need to be reused, contact me, or another administrator for retrieval. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Hip-hop magazines

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article consists of original research about the importance of "Magazines" in the hip-hop culture. At beast, I believe this article can be transformed in List of hip-hop magazines, if someone can take the time of finding some sources and removing the original research. Damiens .rf 16:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The entire thing is one big WP:OR mess. If there were anything notable that was properly sourced, then I would say merge those bits into Hip hop, but since there's not, then not.  Cirt (talk) 17:48, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Cirt. Razorflame 01:18, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - take your pick: original research or editorial essay. Either way, it doesn't belong here. Also, article is improperly named per WP:NAME. B.Wind (talk) 04:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment There's lots of references down the bottom, but the content is not based on them.  If this is true, then delete.  Would anyone want the references to help create a new article?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.