Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hip hop feud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:41, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Hip hop feud
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A violation of WP:Verifiability and doesn't not match any sourced elements. 75.129.225.170 (talk) 13:16, 7 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. 75.129.225.170 (talk) 17:02, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. 75.129.225.170 (talk) 17:02, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I suppose as I see nothing better. Pinging the only seemingly interested user . SwisterTwister   talk  05:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep, if WP:NOTE is satisfied I don't have any strong feelings about the article one way or the other. What's important is to ask: Do the secondary sources cited in the article not satisfy notability guidelines? If not, then how so? And if they do, then what's this "I suppose as I see nothing better" stuff? Nightscream (talk) 15:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 November 2.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 05:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete This article is nothing, but unsourced and dead links that do not exist. This should be deleted until references are complete. 75.129.225.170 (talk) 13:16, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Hard to see why combining the words Hip Hop to the word feud, deserves it's own article. Any differences between the individual artists can be handled on those artists pages.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:59, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Individuals in this industry have engaged in feuds, that does not mean that the topic merits an article. To support an article we would need significant, independent sources (journalism and academic - yes, Virginia, there are university professors of hip hop music) discussing hip feuds as a specific and special phenomenon, with defined characteristics and asserted implications.  In other words, hip hop feuds happen, but I haven't found evidence that thy are a thing.  Also, the Category:Hip  hop feuds appears to be useful, but an article appears unwarranted at present.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.