Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hip hop rivalry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 05:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Hip hop rivalry

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Un-encyclopedic, non-notable, trivial content. Full of alledged and unsourced comments littered with weasel wording. Delete as per the G-Unit feuds article. Lugnuts 19:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom and G-Unit feuds AfD. --- Realest4Life 23:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Condense and Keep Although the bulk of the article is essentially a list with unnecessary detail, the topic itself isnotable. What we need to do is hang on to it, get rid of all the pointless information, and expand it with information of an encyclopedic nature. Calgary 23:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Realest4Life & Other Hip hop rivalry AfD Na uf ana  :  talk  01:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and purge - all of the individual rivalries need to be deleted per notability and BLP concerns but the topic of rivalries is notable. Otto4711 04:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - If we were to remove all the individual rivalries, the article would be a stub. Maybe we should just give the topic a mention in the Hip hop or Hip hop music articles, if there isn't already one. --- Realest4Life 15:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Nothing wrong with stubs. Otto4711 15:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * All right then. --- Realest4Life 16:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete- Although I didnt want the G-Unit Feuds article to be deleted, this should be deleted for the same reasons. --The-G-Unit-Boss 17:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete-All these beefs are explained on the respective artists articlesCosprings 18:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Information is much better kept in the relevant biography pages. Spellcast 19:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * keep - I was just reading an article at Slate that used the phrase "dis track", something I had never heard of. I immediately went to Wikipedia, and that entry redirected to this article, which has proven useful to me. TJIC
 * KEEP - there's no reason to delete... if there's please tell me? West Coast Ryda 17:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - The reason is stated at the top. --- Realest4Life 20:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.