Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hippocampus Press

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 15:01, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hippocampus Press
Vanity page. They publish Lovecraft works (but then so do several others). Once more, notable or not able? Radiant! 10:40, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. Written in first person. Probably copyvio. Trilobite (Talk) 11:08, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Publisher is currently not notable: only two books listed on Amazon with very low rankings, insufficiently popular web site for traffic data to exist on Alexa, which also notes only four other web sites linking to them. Maybe one day they will be an encyclopedically cultural force, but not now. Oh, and it's advertising. HyperZonktalk 17:25, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I just marked it as copyvio because it is a direct copy from the company's About Us web page. Zzyzx11 21:10, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep if and when the copyvio is cleaned up. Megan1967 02:39, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Copyvio, non-notable publisher.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 00:52, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems notable on Google. JamesBurns 10:24, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.