Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hipster hop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Sandstein  05:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Hipster hop

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NEO, no serious use of such a term by any reliable source. Cntras (talk) 02:59, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 08:11, 17 August 2011 (UTC)


 * keep I did a little work on this, which perhaps will assuage some of your worries, and more could be done. there are plenty of reliable sources, and the genre is notable in my opinion.  anyway, see what you think.  Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 14:08, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * As stated in the second paragraph of WP:NEO, the references need to articulate with greater detail the actual characteristics/elements of the term rather than simply applying the label to a subject. -Cntras (talk) 12:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * dandy. i'm not on a mission. you said there's no serious use of such a term by any reliable source.  this seemed wrong to me, and i showed that it was.  i have no interest in writing this article, merely in showing that, given that there are plenty of serious uses of the term by plenty of reliable sources, perhaps someone might have an interest in writing the article, and that therefore should be kept. some of these sources, esp the first, analyse the term itself, rather than just using it, as is frowned upon by wp:neo Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment lol 86.44.18.93 (talk) 02:52, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Alf.laylah.wa.laylah's improvements, addressing the nom's primary concern re reliable sources. The rest can be cleaned up, deletion not warranted. -- &oelig; &trade; 18:12, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 16:40, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.