Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiral Mei


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 15:45, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Hiral Mei

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough reliable sources to show notability Galaxy Kid (talk) 07:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  07:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  07:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  07:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Keep The article did not include any details that are not verifiable or promotional in nature. The sources quoted are not taken from social networking sites or similar nature websites. The article is already mentioned to be a stub. The subject, who is a film actress, is already credited (the roles were notable) for her work and that can be verified if we got through cast list of those movies in the internet. Abyjohn1991 (talk) 14:14, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * None of the four references used are WP:RS; pinkvilla.com, bollywoodirect.com, bfwa.in, and cinemagigs.com. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. There is nothing to indicate that she satisfiess Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The full text of one of the cited sources is "Heeral Mei is an Indian actress who will portray the role of Princess Malavika in the upcoming thriller Main Aur Charles." Another one merely includes her name in a list of credits. Another one has a two sentence mention of her, references Wikipedia, and refers to her as "he". Another one has a one sentence mention of her in a page about another actor. The "keep" arguments above, from the editor who created the article, are all Strawman arguments, as nobody said that the article contained details that were "not verifiable or promotional", that the sources were "taken from social networking sites or similar nature websites", or that her roles cannot be verified from cast lists. Those reasons do nothing at all to answer the reason which was actually given for proposing deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:53, 26 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:25, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Delete – I search alot but fail to find any reliable sources. I also noticed that this is the same copy-past version of the previously speedy deleted version. Singh (talk) 20:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Her roles in Bombay Velvet, and Main Aur Charles are not significant enough. A few passing mentions in reliable sources don't indicate notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.--Skr15081997 (talk) 11:44, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.