Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiranandani Estate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Hiranandani Estate

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

While not denying that this estate may be notable, I believe it's currently simply advertising masquerading as an article, as shown by phrases such as "Along with simplicity of design and strong construction, the complex also boasts ". I think, in this case, it's best to delete the entire thing and start again - this time without any input from employees of the company! Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 08:22, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Not agreed, If article is not as per wikipedia guideline then we should contribute to article and make it as per guide line. If you think article is written like advertising then we can re-write it. I m not in favor of deleting, instead we can re-write it. KuwarOnline (talk) 11:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. This would appear to be about a private development complex, not an established place name: Hiranandani Estate is an upmarket condominium-styled township built by the Hiranandani Group in Thane city, a suburb in the Mumbai Metropolitan Area...  As noted, the advertising style of this article is so sweetly promotionally slanted that just reading the text will rot your teeth. I gather that Indian use of township does not correspond to US or Canadian use of the term; here a "township" is a subdivision of a county.  The article Hiranandani Gardens is similar in style and probably ought to share this one's fate. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:23, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  —Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:25, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have stubbed the article and added a reliable source which describes it as "posh". So i kept the "upmarket" descriptor in the article.--Sodabottle (talk) 15:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Appears large enough to be notable,and in the present version i see no signs of promotionalism, just description.  DGG ( talk ) 07:33, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Agreed, seems like the promotional material has been removed but the article does need expansion. Vedant (talk) 14:43, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.