Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiro Nakamura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 01:07, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Hiro Nakamura

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

As per maintenance tags: fictograpy, fancruft. Isaac Mendez has been AfD'd for similar reasons. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 21:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Television. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 21:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Click on the reliable sources referenced in the article already. https://www.today.com/id/wbna16756741 and https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-oct-29-ca-performance29-story.html for instance.  The general notability guidelines have been met.  Any problems can be discussed on the talk page and solved through normal editing practices.   D r e a m Focus  23:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Dream Focus. //Julle (talk) 23:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: FTR, I've already tried to delete all the WP:FANCRUFT and it got instantly reverted. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 23:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Then the next step is to start a discussion on the article talk page explaining why this content should be removed. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article does appear to meet WP:GNG, the issues in the maintenance tags are all surmountable problems. I don't think every character necessarily in this franchise needs a standalone article, but that's something that should be handled on a case-by-case basis. It is my understanding, however, that this is, if not the protagonist, one of the important ones. This for example is a level of extensive coverage just for this one specific character that I doubt you'd find for every character. I think the notability is there, though I do think the article could use a rewrite. We shouldn't be using the word ironically when describing something for example, and the sheer amount of unsourced detail in the article seems staggeringly disproportionate to the sourced content. However these are problems that can be fixed by editing, not via deletion. - Aoidh (talk) 08:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.