Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hirosh Joseph


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 04:16, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Hirosh Joseph

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. The three refs currently in the article are all primary (his book and his two patents). The external link mentions he was a speaker at a convention but doesn't go into significant detail. I can't find any other reliable sources. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:52, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  15:21, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Note that the book was edited by another person, and Hirosh is listed as one of two "with contributions from...". In any case, none of the references is a third-party source, and I can't find any. Oddly enough (and I cannot confirm or disprove any of this), the book is listed on a web site that calls out plagiarism in the security field, and claims that much of the book is plagiarized. This does not affect the !vote, but might be an interesting area for someone to investigate. LaMona (talk) 17:41, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly not notable; no significant publications.  DGG ( talk ) 01:36, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.