Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/His name was Robeson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 01:49, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

His name was Robeson

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet any of the criteria within WP:NFILM and fails WP:GNG. Searches of "Его звали Робсон" and "His name was Robeson" yield no coverage in independent sources. The Russian Wikipedia article was deleted today because there was no evidence of notability. I would oppose a merge to Paul Robeson or Paul Robeson Jr. or Itzik Feffer as the film isn't notable enough even for that. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:49, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:49, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:49, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge FWIW, it has a short mention in Paul_Robeson, which I think this could be partly merged into Shushugah (talk) 23:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * In my view, there should be at least one reliable source on the film before performing a merge. The YouTube video itself isn't enough. I can see that the user has tried adding it to Robeson's article twice already and it's been correctly reverted. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - I would agree with the merge if 's condition could be met, but I can't find any reliable sourcing for this documentary. Ping me if reliable sourcing is found to merge. Definitely not notable enough to pass WP:GNG, and definitely doesn't meet WP:NFILM.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:04, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - with no coverage in independent sources there's definitely not enough here for a standalone article, and I think the brief mention already extant in Paul Robeson is all it really warrants. ƒirefly  ( t · c ) 10:36, 28 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.