Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historic South


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 18:32, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Historic South

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article does not have any sources and a Google search does not find any results related to this. I333cat (talk) 17:48, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:26, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources confirm it's confined to this area, mentions of it from South Carolina to a half dozen other status in Google. Oaktree b (talk) 19:34, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Failed and seemingly invented tourism region definition (counties aren't awkwardly excluded because that just never makes sense), and a term so vague as to be useless.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 22:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article has zero sources. On the state's own web site, the page about "Historic South" has obscure HTML in lieu of understandable content. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:39, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I am not finding that RSs uses this term. This is possibly an OR situation. An article can be written if this becomes a term discussed by RS. Bruxton (talk) 16:07, 4 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.