Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical accuracy of Enemy at the Gates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 04:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Historical accuracy of Enemy at the Gates

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Unreferenced original research. Even if technically verifiable, it would probably still be a case of synthesis, and even then, Wikipedia's job is not to point out every little inaccuracy in movies or television programs. Such content infamously plagues various articles on made-for-TV paleontology docs, and consensus around those parts is generally to delete it on sight. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 20:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research, no sources, not WP:NPOV. The main article Enemy at the Gates already has a section on historical accuracy. If any of these statements can be verified then they can be merged back in to the main page. CodeTheorist (talk) 21:58, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No objection to this being done speedily. --IllaZilla (talk) 22:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:41, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge anything useful/delete. Main article on film isn't long enough to need spin-out. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:24, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as per CodeTheorist, the nominator, et al. If any of the statements can be verified, they can be merged back to the main page.  Ubelowme U  Me  15:36, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This doesn't need a separate wikipedia article. --Artene50 (talk) 18:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination Nick-D (talk) 12:17, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Intothatdarkness 17:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Nick-D (talk) 12:17, 6 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as nomination. Prestonmag (talk) 17:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, an OR piece. -Cntras (talk) 06:02, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.