Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historicity of Muhammad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000  ( talk,  contribs ) 23:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Historicity of Muhammad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This whole article is based upon the false views and judgements formed by the Jews and Christians only, and the point of view of Muslims has been thoroughly ignored. The article is conveying misleading information to the readers and is nothing but a hoax. Wikipedia is believed to be a source of authentic information based upon true and valid sources and reliable evidences, however, this article clearly ignores this fact. This article is nothing but a baseless discussion which shall not be attributed to the Biography of a Special Historical Figure with whom sentiments of billions of people have been attached. The article shall be deleted on the grounds that the following references are missing: -archaeological proof of existence of Prophet Muhammad; -books written by Muslim scholars evidencing his existence; -Other Christian research and books in favor; -lineage of Prophet Muhammad; -Important and Famous Muslim historical Scientists believing Prophet Muhammad; -Bible mentioning Prophet Muhammad; -Torah mentioning Prophet Muhammad; -Quran mentioning Prophet Muhammad; - Authenticity of Quran and the scientific proof of verses of Quran; -Auliya and Wali Allah following Prophet Muhamamd; -True predictions made by Prophet Muhammad; -Letters written by Prophet Muhammad to different rulers in the world; -Archaeological proof of the existence of other historical figures as highlighted in the Quran. Haxeeb1987 (talk) 18:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion for Historicity of Muhammad
 * Speedy keep Vexatious nomination by a new account who didn't follow direction nor understands what AFD is for. Sourcing issues can be brought up on the talk page. This article is not a candidate for deletion in any form. --Majora (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - Absolutely no violations of WP:DEL to be found. Bogus nomination. Karunamon ✉ 21:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep as an obviously appropriate topic for an encyclopedia to cover. On an initial reading I find that this article might give a bit too much coverage of a rather fringe view that Muhammad did not exist, but that is a matter for discussion about content on the article talk page rather than anything that means this should be deleted. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 22:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep There is clearly justification to have this article. This is not in any way an endorsement of its form or contents. I would also say the article gives way too much space the the fringe view that Muhammad never existed.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.