Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History, Process, Benefits, and Kinds of Miso


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and... (The preceding comment added by Lourdes  to resolve breaking of the Afd script) ) moved back to a userspace draft, User:Gillianhai/sandbox.  This appears to be a class project (Wiki Ed/University of British Columbia/FNH 200 102 (Term 2)) and the instructor is guiding the students, so it is best to keep the text as a draft rather than deleting outright. , I suggest that you have your students improve existing articles, such as miso, instead of creating new articles on existing topics.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:08, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

History, Process, Benefits, and Kinds of Miso

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Strongly may not meet MOS, this should be declined if it is a draft. This seems terrible. 333-blue 04:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is a student entry, which explains the way it's written - it's fairly common for students to write something in an essay style since that's what they're used to. Offhand we don't really need this specific page because we already have an article at miso, but some of the information could probably be merged as long as it's sourced properly and is written to fit the WP:MOS. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an unacceptable content fork of Miso. All content that would fall under this long, unwieldy, counterintuitive article title should instead be covered at Miso and I see no reason for a separate article to exist. In all honesty, the fact that this strange article was created by a student is of no interest to me. Instructors should ensure that students thoroughly understand our core content policies before unleashing them and their articles on the encyclopedia. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  05:23, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing suggesting convincing independent notability and needs for its own article. SwisterTwister   talk  07:28, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  13:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Snow delete as an unacceptable fork of Miso. It should never have been let out of the students' sandbox. -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is an entry from my students and I let it out of their sandbox. We followed a set of [|Moving Out of Sandbox] instructions and got confused. Please allow us time to merge its content with Miso. As an instructor who created this assignment, I am learning a lot, including MOS. JudyCChan talk —Preceding undated comment added 23:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not requiring its own article as noted by other editors. As to the comment by User:Cullen328 that "ason for a separate article to exist. In all honesty, the fact that this strange article was created by a student is of no interest to me. Instructors should ensure that students thoroughly understand our core content policies before unleashing them and their articles on the encyclopedia," I agree, but the underlying problem is that instructors should ensure that they understand our core content policies before ensuring that students understand our core content policies.  The real problem isn't the students; it is the instructors.  In this case the instructor may understand the content policies and may have simply made a mistake.  However, Wikipedia class assignments are often troublesome.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:49, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Miso.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   05:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge then delete because it is an implausible redirect. You have to give the student serious credit for their work; this "essay" is miles ahead of the current article at miso in terms of detail, history and sourcing. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 11:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.