Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History and Origin Of Sarrara Abbasi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 22:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

History and Origin Of Sarrara Abbasi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be purely original research. Ymblanter (talk) 09:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Please tell me why this article is being considered for deletion ? How does it violates community standards? -Ahsanwqr (talk)
 * For one thing, no sources are provided other than one other Wikipedia article -- and Wikipedia is itself not considered a reliable source. Also, even though this is supposed to be an article about history, there are very few mentions of years or even centuries, so that it is unclear when the events described took place. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * This article is about history that's right, this article is written by the person who observed all that with his eyes and all life experience and wrote everything on a paper. So how there is meant to be a source because there is no article other than this on entire Internet! As well everyone is welcomed to edit this article so that there could be more improvements. Ahsanwqr (talk)
 * Unfortunately it does not work. We have policies, WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:OR, which essentially say that Wikipedia can only have articles on subjects for which we have previously published material (and not even every publication qualifies). The way to proceed would be to publish an account of the person, wait until it gets noticed and generates some responses, and, after carefully studying the policies I just cited, to start a Wikipedia article.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Seeing the current position of this article what must be done in this to make it qualified? This article means alot. Please help me out.Ahsanwqr (talk)
 * I would recommend adding some citations to the article that would associate the facts in the article with specific reliable sources, such as books, which would confirm that the statements in the article are true. (And while you are at it, please indicate in what years or at least what centuries the events described in the article took place.) I can't guarantee that the article will be kept if you make those improvements, but its chances will improve if you do. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:54, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOR. The subject isn't notable and the original author admits this is OR. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.