Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Family Guy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. There are a lot of comments favoring a merge, but no strong consensus to do so. As merging is an editorial decision and a form of keeping the information, this debate is closed only as keep but discussion on whether to merge it or not is welcomed to continue on the article talk page.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 20:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

History of Family Guy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Most TV show histories on this wiki are placed on the show's main article. And what's with that unencyclopedic and offtopic "Uncensored" section? (trogga) 00:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with Family Guy, no need for a separate article. --Canley 04:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Legitimate subsidiary article of Family Guy per Summary style. EALacey 12:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SUMMARY. I did remove that "uncensored" section as completely unreferenced. Otto4711 13:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Extremely redundant. Merge as needed with Family Guy, where this info belongs. / edgarde 01:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per WP:NOT. Article is too long to merge, perfectly valid at present. Matthew 08:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - WP:SS. Good out of universe article. - Peregrine Fisher 14:48, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with Family Guy. Neither article is terribly unwieldly, and merging would make a substantial, comprehensive whole. Captain Infinity 20:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge, the point of the main Family Guy article is to give an overview of the show, and should have a section on it's creation and such. Widdle down things and put back into that article.  There are hundreds of shows in history far more important than family guy, and I don't see any "The History of C*H*I*P*S" articles floating around.  Dannycali 22:48, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.