Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Internet browser advertising filter systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  14:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

History of Internet browser advertising filter systems

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The entire article is based on just one self-published source, a series of blog posts by AdGuard. I originally considered merging this into a new "History" section in the Ad blocking article, but wasn't able to validate most of the claims in the nominated article with reliable sources. This article fails WP:V and WP:OR, and should be deleted. —  Newslinger  talk   07:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. —  Newslinger   talk   07:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —  Newslinger   talk   07:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —  Newslinger   talk   07:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —  Newslinger   talk   07:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —  Newslinger   talk   07:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment Barely any technical content in it.  scope_creep Talk  09:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * delete it looks like a ctrl c, then v from a PDF somewhere. I support the presumption of delete unless compelling evidence is made against it. Graywalls (talk) 22:38, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with above....It looks like a copy and paste of a paper. Not encyclopedia worthy. --  Dane  talk  03:57, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.