Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Limousin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per positive consensus and the absence of deletion requests outside of the nominator. A merger discussion does not require the AfD process. The nominator's pessimism about a supposedly non-useful article that defies rehabilitation is not a sensible argument for deletion. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended (talk) 02:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

History of Limousin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page is not useful and cannot be improved
 * Keep. I think this page can be useful and that it could be improved a lot. For example translating from the french article . I started to do something.Lal.sacienne (talk) 07:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 21.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  17:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge Given the current state of Limousin and History of Limousin, I think a merge to the former would be suitable. If and when Limousin becomes well-developed or the history section becomes too extensive, then I have no prejudice to again having a separate history article. Chris857 (talk) 03:28, 22 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep There's room for expansion, as can be seen on fr.wikipedia.org. Even the Occitan Wikipedia has more info. Merging is extra effort and isn't required, since history is a notable topic. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:16, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Page is useful and can be improved. The history of a traditional region of France is most certain to have a great amount of material written about.  The French WP article demonstrates this. Just as we have, for example, History of Delaware, there's plenty useful content available about this history of any region/province/state. --Oakshade (talk) 03:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.