Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Ror's


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

History of Ror's
Article reads as a work of original research, also the article may be a possible copyvip from the books listed in the article. Prod removed without reason by author. Wildthing61476 17:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR and WP:V, and that's being kind. The books are quite likely fictitious also. Sandstein 20:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR and WP:V ... and because after reading it, I still don't know what a "Ror" is! --141.156.232.179 22:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into Ror (caste). The WP:V and WP:OR issues should be simply deleted. JASpencer 09:58, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Peta 04:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 16:11, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree with above. Marcus22 16:34, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as above. You can see where somebody started tagging non-referenced statements and just gave up because of the volume of them. Sockatume 16:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as stated above, it does not meet standards. I hate to see such a large amount of information get deleted, but without sources, it has to go. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 16:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Dennisthe2 18:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Agree with JASpencer that this needs to be merged after removing WP:OR and WP:V issues. However, it is far from clear that anything will be left after that removal, despite JASpencer's valiant efforts.  By the end, I was expecting to hear how the Rors built the Great Wall of China and invented the Internet.  It is very unfortunate considering that the Ror caste is noteworthy and the Ror (caste) article is quite stubby. &mdash;BozoTheScary 21:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above.UberCryxic 23:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge anything salvageable, per above. The title won't be a useful redirect, though, so it could be deleted after this is done.--Cúchullain t/ c 08:06, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.