Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Santa Rosa de Copán, "Los Llanos"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

History of Santa Rosa de Copán, "Los Llanos"

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Google finds not a single suitable source under either its English or Spanish title, and the article offers none. Largoplazo (talk) 17:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NBOOK. This is unreferenced promotional junk. The creator,, indicates on their user page that they might be the author of same. The version on es-wiki should be deleted, too. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I just launched a deletion discussion on Spanish Wikipedia. Largoplazo (talk) 15:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, unsourced and as far as I can tell unsourceable.— S Marshall T/C 13:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - The book doesn't seem to be notable and most/all of the history material in the article is already covered in the history section of the page on the city itself. Smmurphy(Talk) 14:34, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * This book is my work, is a resume description of my city history, now why deleted? (Talk) 21:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * For the reasons given above. It doesn't meet the requirement that articles be about notable topics. Wikipedia isn't a place to attract attention to your book, or to write about subjects over which you have a conflict of interest. See WP:COI. Largoplazo (talk) 20:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Most local history books are NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 10:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom and above rationale. GauchoDude (talk) 17:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.