Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Tamils and Sinhalese in Sri Lanka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted by Dank as: "‎G10: Attack page or negative unsourced BLP"--Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC) (NAC)

History of Tamils and Sinhalese in Sri Lanka

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Opinion piece. I would have redirected it to History of Sri Lanka except for the fact the title is a bit unwieldy. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 11:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:OR-filled, POV-pushing dross. Ironholds (talk) 11:14, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as an original essay. Drawn Some (talk) 11:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete POV rant-piece --Deepak D'Souza 11:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject may be worthy of an article, although such an article may be redundant to articles we already have.    But even if the subject is worthy, this text is so bad that it would be better to start from scratch. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:16, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete but without prejudice to recreation if the current .. screed .. can be replaced with something at least comprehensible. -- Logical Premise Ergo? 14:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Deepak D'Souza. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under CSD#G10, "Pages that serve no purpose but to disparage or threaten their subject or some other entity." Fences and windows (talk) 02:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.