Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of coeducation at Johns Hopkins University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ( X! ·  talk )  · @135  · 02:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

History of coeducation at Johns Hopkins University

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article should be deleted as opposed to being merged as the title is an unlikely search term. The references do not verify the information in the article, they are dead ends. Furthermore, it is written like a personal essay. Drawn Some (talk) 14:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. – Dino Velvet 8MM (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a really weird content fork. Any sourced content can be added to the main article, but a merge definitely doesn't make sense as it's difficult to figure out what's sourced and what's not, and the resulting redirect would just be absurd. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yup, that'd be a very clear delete.— S Marshall  Talk / Cont  16:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Clear content fork. Fuzbaby (talk) 19:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge Not suitable as a separate article, but there is content here that is mergable., I agree the redirect would be a problem, but I do not see how to avoid it. DGG (talk) 23:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Needless fork. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.