Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of industrialisation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SK2. Obviously bad-faith nomination. As deletion is not clean-up, content should be discussed on the talk page. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 (talk) 23:30, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

History of industrialisation

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

article written from a communist perspective Druaga18 (talk) 00:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Here are the reasons i believe the whole article needs to be deleted:
 * Article uses Marxist language such as "exploitation" and "bourgeoisie"
 * Article has a large amount of outsourced claims
 * The Article is very poorly written
 * The map used is horrendous
 * I could keep going on for reasons why this article needs to be deleted, but just read it for yourself and the reason(s) for deletion is evident. Druaga18 (talk) 00:35, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep seems well-sourced, unsure about the communist perspective when it quotes steam engines in England, which was never communist from what I remember. RS sources used, could perhaps use a rewrite. Oaktree b (talk) 00:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG and justification by the WP:SPA nominator to delete is not convincing. CT55555 (talk) 01:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, as article meets WP:GNG and is well-sourced other than a couple citation needed tags. I'm not entirely sure about the "article written from a communist perspective" argument, the article appears written from a neutral point of view to me. Carolina2k22 • (talk)  •  (edits)  05:06, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The rationale for deletion boils down to arguing that the article so violates NPOV that it requires WP:TNT, but I don't see it that way. There are several paragraphs that are unreferenced (or weakly referenced), and improvements could be made to the article. However, WP:DEL-CONTENT wisely notes that if editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page, and I would suggest that make gradual improvements to the page in line with the WP:BRD process rather than seeking deletion. —  Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 08:12, 19 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Badly written is not a reason to delete, and "communism?" this is a WP:GNG about a known phenomena in this history of Earth, industrialization.
 * Ask me about air Cryogenic air (talk) 13:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG wnd contains WP:RS. As above editors susggested the communism part cited by the nominator could be rewritten to maintain WP:NPOV Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 13:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't see how notability would be affected by the content currently in the article. Did you mean to refer to WP:NPOV? —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:57, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah it was meant to be WP:NPOV


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:GNG Bruxton (talk) 15:15, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.