Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the "Protocols of Zion"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. AfD debates don't exist to get an admin to perform complicated merges. If anyone wants to perform a merge, contact me and I'll userfy. Mango juice talk 14:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

History of the "Protocols of Zion"
del a very poor fork of the The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which is a featured article, and which is actually a 90% history. Mukadderat 19:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, but not before the content is moved to the main Protocols article. Allon FambrizziAllon Fambrizzi
 * If any content is moved, Delete is an inappropriate violation of GFDL. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge what's useful (which honestly doesn't look like much), delete the rest. Ergative rlt 22:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Ergative rlt ReverendG 02:53, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is about the content of the text(s) by that title.
 * But most people are unaware that on, about, and after 1934, with the help of Nazi Germany, a 299 page text was published, annonymously, but in the name of Victor E. Marsden as the "author of the translation. Now Marsden was dead by 1920--having died in the Summer of that year.
 * I was to write about numerous editions, editors, publishers, expansions, etc.
 * Yours truly,---Ludvikus 04:02, 13 September 2006 (UTC)


 * After all these non-traditional manipulations with pages and titles I think I am beginning to understand the actual purpose of User:Ludvikus: Bibliography of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion". This aricle, as a concise reference, would make sense provided that there will be no "history", i.e., no events around these publications. Ludvikus, please comment, did I guess correctly? Mukadderat 04:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * How Many Are There???
 * I don't "24 Protocols," or "27 Protocols".
 * I meen how many different texts or imprints
 * Ludvikus 04:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * That's what I mean by using the word "bibliography". Mukadderat 04:38, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The International Jew The 1934 English language 299 page text is a "MERGE" with Henry Ford's "IJ." Ludvikus 04:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Please don't make sections in this page. They are confusing. Mukadderat 04:39, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Please don't vikilink various simple unimportant words. This makes text difficult to read. Mukadderat 04:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Please don't move votes for deletion pages. Mukadderat 18:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do simpler editing work until you understand how wikipedia works. You create a confusion. Please lookm how things done in other places until you gain experience. Mukadderat 18:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete & merge what's salvageable. Agree with Mukadderat's suggestions, and this is not the first time Ludvikus gets good advices. ←Humus sapiens ну? 07:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete duplicate.--Peta 04:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.