Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the Jacobite line of succession


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

History of the Jacobite line of succession

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No reliable sources. Only citation is a self-published personal website. Celia Homeford (talk) 11:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Royalty and nobility. Celia Homeford (talk) 11:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom Andre🚐 05:20, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * REdirect to Jacobite succession or just delete. The subject is sufficiently covered in that article.  This article adds details of the heirs apparent or presumptive to these Pretenders, but that is not valuable information.  Most of those concerned are members of the royalty, for whom appropriate genealogical information will be found in their articles.  I did once see (but did not buy) a book claiming that the succession passed to a child of the Young Pretender (by a mistress), but that depended on the child being legitimate, which the child was not.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.