Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hit Parade Hall of Fame


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to John Rook. Redirecting on the advice of the nominator and the only !voter. Consider this closed as nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Hit Parade Hall of Fame

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article on non-notable "hall of fame" created by banned user. The only Google news hit is for a press release from the company behind this from March 2010, wherein it states that this is just an idea in "start up phase." Delete until such time as this hall of fame achieves real world notability, if ever. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:41, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:46, 4 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect to John Rook. The most significant coverage I can find is this magazine article.  However, this magazine is a freebie entertainment magazine given away at Canadian movie theatres, and the editorial selection, and fact checking for this magazine is probably a bit lax.  Aside from this, it's mostly bio mentions in awards sections such as this example.  This press release would indicate that this hall of fame isn't ready for prime time yet.  And this is reinforced by the fact that their web page is no longer active and just displays adverts for GoDaddy. -- Whpq (talk) 13:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * As nominator, I support the redirect proposal. Wish I'd thought of it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:55, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.