Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitman Killers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Hitman Assassins.  MBisanz  talk 23:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Hitman Killers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Yet another no-context OR gameguide: see Hitman Assassins and Hitman weapons.  Acroterion  (talk)  18:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Although I still think it meets the criteria for speedy deletion, it also has zero sourcing and no context. Furthermore, it is full of misspellings, punctuation errors, and grammatical mistakes. Wperdue (talk) 18:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue
 * Delete, no evidence of notability or existence of topic provided in article. Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 19:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Hitman Assassins, it covers the same ground. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There's no reliable sources that show any notability in the real-world.  Them From  Space  01:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as duplication of List of characters in the Hitman series which has stood since Sep 2007, and also of Hitman Assassins which was created by the same contributor a few days ago. Was one created because the other was nominated for deletion? Although I don't want this to be an unpleasant introduction to WP for a new contributor, this rash of excessive Hitman articles needs to stop. Someoneanother 15:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as duplication of List of characters in the Hitman series - Hitman Assassins is also subjected to AfD, for pretty much the same reasons. Article author has removed CSD tags on his own, a big no-no, and its obvious he means well but has no idea on how to proceed.--Cerejota (talk) 18:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.