Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoài Thượng


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn AfD. I'm withdrawing this, as despite the lack of content it IS notable. -

→Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  21:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Hoài Thượng

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable – →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  04:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NGEO and WP:NPLACE. Populated settlements are generally considered notable regardless of size. If you need sources to overcome the WP:V hurdle, I suggest referring to those in the Vietnamese Wikipedia entry. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 06:23, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * A Google search confirms that the commune is definitely there. Verifiability is a surmountable issue. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep as the nom has provided no rationale as to why this is "non notable." A verified population center. . --Oakshade (talk) 21:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.