Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ho Chi Minh City Model United Nations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 00:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Ho Chi Minh City Model United Nations

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

NN student group. No claim at notability, no verifiability. Prod removed because location makes it notable. I tend to disagree. Mystache 04:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - probably speedy, since there is no notability asserted. --Haemo
 * Speedy delete per above, and these things are always deleted when they come up at AfD anyway. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, there are lots of MUNs and this is no more notable than others. Bein gin Ho Chi Minh City doesn't intrinsicially make anything notable anyway, any more than if it were in any other city. -- Mithent 17:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Abstain, - I wish to register abstention from this vote as impartiality, but I do agree with delete, and keep maintenance of vigilance, this group is concerning the monitors. Wen Hsing 18:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * week Keep I brought it here to see the opinions; I consider holding one of these typically-US events an interesting manifestation of the general acceptance of US -style educational institutions. DGG 03:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It doesn't seem to be unique or even unusual, according to the MUN article they're in 48 countries and every continent. Besides, even if it were the only one, does doing something outside the area where it is usually done necessarily qualify it for an article?  Would a taco stand in Massachusetts be any more notable than a similar one in Mexico city?  Novelty and notability sometimes concur but aren't necessarily synonyms. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, what is notable with this particular MUN? Punkmorten 08:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 11:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.