Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoar fox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. Clear consensus that this cannot stay as its own article and that it might fit in the list that already exists. Questions about the notability of the monster list need to be addressed in its own AFD. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Hoar fox

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 12:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge with Dungeons & Dragons. The article on the hoar fox is only a brief one, but it might have enough interest to fans of role-playing games to be merged into the article on Dungeons and Dragons. Vorbee (talk) 15:16, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters, where it is already listed. This is an extremely minor, utterly non-notable creature in D&D, and has no substantial non-primary sources that discuss it whatsoever.  Rorshacma (talk) 15:54, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Not only where it is already listed, but also where the listing lacks the very information given here, and indeed where this title used to redirect. Uncle G (talk) 16:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Other articles that made out of what were originally redirects to the monster list articles are witherstench, screaming devilkin, gorilla bear,, doombat, , and Babbler (Dungeons & Dragons).  Please note that AFD is not the place to come to merge them back.  Article merger does not involve the deletion tool and administrators.  Be bold and do the mergers that you want.  Discuss on article talk pages, like any other use of the ordinary editing tool.  Uncle G (talk) 16:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge into Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, and the monster index is similarly lacking in notability.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge The article should not stay on its own but deletion is not the best solution. Ktrimi991 (talk) 00:44, 4 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.