Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoax about folder named CON in windows operating system


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. Tim Vickers (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Hoax about folder named CON in windows operating system

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research essay about some programming bug. Not remotely notable. Hemlock Martinis (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete if the article was to be rescued (aside from the notability issue) it would need a new title and wholly rewritten text i.e. a new article on a different (but related) subject. Nick Connolly (talk) 19:24, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:N and full of WP:OR.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 19:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as it fails WP:N ArcAngel (talk) 19:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable. Renee (talk) 19:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The author seems to be undecided as to whether this thing is a hoax or not. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 20:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, but I suppose it could be mentioned in the Microsoft Windows article. --Pixelface (talk) 20:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 20:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research and not notable at this time. Shell babelfish 22:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Probably like everyone here tried it and I couldn't create a folder but beside that not worthy of an article per WP:N.--BigDunc (talk) 22:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, chain e-mail demonstrating misunderstanding of reserved words is not itself notable. If this were reliably sourced, perhaps a mention in another article; there's something close at LPT. --Dhartung | Talk 22:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.