Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoda Mokhtar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Hoda Mokhtar
The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable associate professor. Fails WP:PROF. red dogsix (talk) 23:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as absolutely nothing for WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF. SwisterTwister   talk  00:32, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wholly unconvinced the professor meets guidelines for notability at this time. Sro23 (talk) 00:44, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 02:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 02:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 02:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 02:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:Too soon to meet WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete. Doesn't meet WP:PROF. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 09:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. 2005 PhD, associate professor since 2012. Little on her CV to indicate notability; associate editor of Egyptian Informatics Journal (not the editor-in-chief) and on the editorial board of International Journal of Database Management Systems seem the strongest indications but neither is enough to meet WP:PROF criterion 8. A couple of her papers have respectable citations (71,43) but there's no evidence of a substantial body of cited work to meet WP:PROF 1. Espresso Addict (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - not yet, at least. Smmurphy(Talk) 12:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:TOOSOON. Too few citations in her scholar profile, in a high-citation field, to pass WP:PROF, and no other indication of notability is evident. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:30, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:TOOSOON. Tymon. r   Do you have any questions?  21:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.