Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hofstra quidditch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Article is found to not be notable. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 01:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Hofstra quidditch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is an orphaned stub, and the subject fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:ORG. I conducted the requisite searches, and there is no significant outside coverage of the subject. The article cites no sources unrelated to the subject. The subject is a team playing a sport that is becoming gradually more notable, and plays for a university which is notable, but per WP:INHERITORG, this does not establish sufficient notability. Since the articles creation over a year ago, it has not expanded from the initial stub, and given the lack of sources, it is unlikely to expand anytime in the foreseeable future. WantaghNY (talk) 18:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 5 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for failing GNG or possibly redirect to US Quidditch. When they make the sports pages of a newspaper, then we can talk. Until then, we'll just have to muggle through without it. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:21, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.