Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hogan & Hartson

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:00, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Hogan & Hartson
This article does not establish the importance of this law firm. Denni &#9775; 02:56, 2005 September 2 (UTC)
 * Keep largest law firm based in Washington, DC. -- DS1953 04:21, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Denni. Deadsalmon 04:45, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Large multinational lawfirm. 136.153.2.2 05:02, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * That was me. A Google search for "Hogan & Hartson" gets 106,000 results. Capitalistroadster 05:06, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Please play again.   &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 06:42, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. The failure of the article to currently establish notability does not infer the subject of the article is not notable. If it's broke,  . Proto t c 09:20, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Prove more notability. Roodog2k (talk) 11:34, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep/Expand - It seems to be Wiki-worthy! UniReb 12:01, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, expand - U.S. Supreme Court nominee John Roberts was part of this firm for several years in the 80s and again in the 90s, arguing several cases before the Supreme Court for them. -- BD2412 talk 19:39, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * strong keep notable for being large, and for being Roberts's former firm. &mdash; brighterorange   (talk) 21:00, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.