Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holden Dirt Track Racing Australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per request of author via CSD. Risker (talk) 05:24, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Holden Dirt Track Racing Australia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough references found to be notable for inclusion, per WP:GNG. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep references are good. 👍🏻Like it! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 07:43, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * What references are you referring to? Just a Mobygames listing isn't enough.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * , you "like it"? It has a single reference, not several references. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:56, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I wrote that? Sorry. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 15:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. I got one result on the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine. Not notable. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:56, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. Could redirect to developer article Ratbag Games but that has no sources and questionable notability itself. --The1337gamer (talk) 17:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Quinton Feldberg (talk) 17:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I request that this article be tagged for "speedy deletion". Nobody can provide any notability and nobody wants to contribute. The article in my mind stands as "dead end". If game enthusiasts absolutely want to discover information on this game, they can look up and search for the game on MobyGames.com. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 21:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * As you have been creating a lot of stub articles in the past I think you should read WP:GNG on what makes a notable Wikipedia article. Just because a game is listed on MobyGames or Gamefaqs does not make it fit for a Wikipedia article. Use the WP:VG Custom Search tool and WP:VG/S to avoid unreliable sources. I generally only make articles if I can make them into Start Class articles with several reliable sources because Stub articles are not much better than redlinks. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:40, 13 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.