Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holden Matthews (arsonist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:57, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Holden Matthews (arsonist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Clearly WP:BLPCRIME, WP:NOTNEWS. He has not yet been convicted of arson, which is the only charge against him. w umbolo  ^^^  20:53, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. He is accused, not convicted, so aren't their WP:BLP issues too?...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:04, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as a pseudobiography of one arrest. Clear WP:BLPCRIME violation.  Without a conviction, even the title is a BLP violation.  Zero biographical depth. The crime may be a notable event, but that doesn't mean the alleged perpetrator should get a Wikipedia article. • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:TOOSOON, if he is convicted then the subject can be reconsidered such as through WP:AFC, I'm adding a speedy for blp violation Atlantic306 (talk) 13:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.