Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holden Outerwear


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty (talk) 15:16, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Holden Outerwear

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP no significant independent coverage, the press releases and blogs are not sufficient to establish notability. Theroadislong (talk) 16:53, 21 November 2018 (UTC) Theroadislong (talk) 16:53, 21 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment Not saying it's enough, but these (Cengage) seem independent: . Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:10, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:10, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:34, 28 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:06, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - There is non-trivial, independent coverage in the form of case studies in at least four books. Also, there is some independent news coverage (excluding coverage spawned by press releases).- MrX 🖋 23:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Hi, can you please provide the titles of the books (or even better, links) that contain the case studies please? Also, please provide links to the independent news coverage you refer to above.  HighKing++ 19:06, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * By the way, there are convenient links at the top of the page that allow you to do the same Google searches that I used to find these.- MrX 🖋 19:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets independent coverage and notability requirements. Specifically, see the sources linked to by MrX --DannyS712 (talk) 02:54, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep – Meets WP:CORPDEPTH as per a source review. North America1000 04:18, 12 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.