Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holiday Swap (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:44, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Holiday Swap
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a company that fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.

There's not enough WP:SIGCOV to have a page at this time i think it's just WP:TOOSOON. Note: This is the second nomination and issues in the first were still not addressed during recreation. Lapablo (talk) 18:39, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:04, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:04, 28 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt: An article moved into mainspace by the WP:SPA creator. The coverage that exists tends to be start-up publicity hung on the firm founder's previous tourism activity. Considered as a company, this is not sufficient for WP:NCORP. Considered alternatively as a software application, the "Best new mobile app" Silver Award for April 2018 does not look inherently WP:GNG notable. I suggest WP:SALT so that any 3rd return, should that be sought, is organised via WP:AFC. AllyD (talk) 07:48, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete The only possibly acceptable source is the independent. But it's from their  Business Insider section, and Business Insider generally sources its material from PRweb.  Ina ny case, it's a self-serving interview.  More and more, the usual standards for independent journalism are unreliable. I now tend to judge not by the name of the publication, but by the nature of the article. In any case, this is a spa who first tried unsuccesfully to write an article about the firm's CEO, after an earlier article about the firm by a spa was deleted.  DGG ( talk ) 05:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Still not notable (WP:NCORP), still an article created for promotional purposes (WP:NOTPROMO). Policy or guideline, take your pick, but this doesn't belong in the encyclopedia. Bakazaka (talk) 01:05, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.