Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holidays Uncovered


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 06:44, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Holidays Uncovered

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This website seems to have generated very little coverage by secondary sources, and was created by a User:Holsuncovered. There is very little in the way of an indication of notability in the article, and the Alexa ranking for the website is not very high. From what I can tell, I think that it does not yet merit an article. Dominic·t 11:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The article was originally created as a blatant advertisment, however i have cleaned it up. I think it is worthy of an article as it has recived significant coverage in these secondary sources:
 * The Times article which mentions this site.
 * Article about TUI Travel wanting to buy them out.
 * Patton t / c 12:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That is not significant coverage. The first is simply a single passing reference in a list in the article and the second is an industry publication's blog post on the company's sale. It doesn't add up to much. Dominic·t 12:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Is it enough to write an informative, although short article? Yes it is, so it isn't trivial.-- Patton t / c 13:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:WEB, as I'm not finding "multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself" that have this site as their subject. Deor (talk) 14:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   --  fr33k  man   -s-  14:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * delete per User:Dominic, little notability as many companies get mentions in articles, but there really needs to be more coverage; very little known in country of origin  fr33k man   -s-  17:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:N. A passing mention in the London Times and a small article in a trade magazine are not significant coverage. Quantumobserver (talk) 18:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. It might be getting short mentions, but there's nothing remarkable about the site that would warrant an article. If TUI Travel actually buys it, we can talk mergers or stubbing. (there is not enough coverage in secondary sources to build a substantial stub with) - Mgm|(talk) 21:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.