Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HollaEx Kit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

HollaEx Kit

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested PROD - this organisation product does not appear to meet WP:NCORP etc - sourcing I could find does not amount to significant coverage in independent sources. All the secondary sources given appear to be passing mentions or only contain quotes from the company's founder. firefly ( t · c ) 12:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions.  firefly  ( t · c ) 12:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  firefly  ( t · c ) 12:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:46, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:09, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * KEEP:, nominator probably doesn't have access to sources. And, it's not an organization page, this page is about the kit that has |hundreds of sources. There are so many in-depth independent sources available for this topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daringsmith (talk • contribs) 12:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I've looked through most of the sources. Many of them contain passing mentions/quotes from involved people. The Yahoo! source is in-depth, but reads like a press release and is not original content by Yahoo, but instead from a less reliable commercial website. WP:NORG also applies to products, so the "best of the best" fails as significant coverage per WP:ORGDEPTH. Femke (talk) 18:51, 19 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.