Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holland-Mark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:41, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Holland-Mark

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This company does not appear to be notable enough for its own page. Any coverage of the agency seems to either be the type that would originate from a company press release, or brief coverage of a prior closure. It appears to fail WP:CORPDEPTH. Editor10293813 (talk) 22:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Editor10293813 (talk) 22:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Editor10293813 (talk) 22:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:N. A handful of web search results, and the copy reads like an ad.-- &#x03C6; OnePt618Talk &#x03C6;  04:12, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete For same reasons as already provided. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agreed with prior posters. There's just no coverage here that indicates notability, and too much of it smacks of PR. Maybe, now they've reopened, they'll be notable at some point, but not now. Waggie (talk) 04:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.