Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollow Flame


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --F a ng Aili 說嗎? 03:00, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Hollow Flame
non-notable band. Delete.Deyyaz [ Talk 01:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - they've sold 500 copies of a CD. Good luck to them, but wikipedia policy is to delete. - Richardcavell 01:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nowhere near WP:MUSIC Morgan Wick 02:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Morgan Wick. DarthVad e r 02:35, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Rcavell. GREAT hair tho.  Dei zio  03:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Cavell. Hair is notable, however, as per Deizio. --Deville (Talk) 03:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Morgan Wick. Sorry Guy 03:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete db-band candidates. WP:Music violation - albums, singles, chart positions, notable members, tours.   (aeropagitica)    (talk)   06:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete- for reasons listed above. DVD+ R/W 06:04, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per above. --Arnzy (Talk) 08:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:MUSIC, nn. --Ter e nce Ong 12:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * delete article is not encyclopedic, band fails WP:MUSIC, and hair looks like fire hazard Pete.Hurd 02:44, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:MUS.&#160;—  The KMan  talk  20:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.