Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Body


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. PeaceNT (talk) 14:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Holly Body

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable porn actress. Fails WP:PORN. Lots of Ghits to sites selling her videos. Redfarmer (talk) 19:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Two foreign-language Wikipedias have a page on her. Does the English-language Wikipedia have stricter rules regarding article creation on the subject of pornography than the Spanish and Italian ones? --Chatzaras (talk) 19:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, pertaining to Chatzaras comment, if I spoke Spanish or Italian I'd support the same decision, deletion. -RiverHockey (talk) 00:34, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of notability. To answer the above question, yes, there's been a change in the porn notability requirements. You'll note that many of these having been coming through Afd of late. Xymmax (talk) 00:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Body Double, the source of the name. Otto4711 (talk) 19:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 06:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Couldn't find any evidence of nominations or awards or mainstream coverage to satisfy wp:bioVinh1313 (talk) 06:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment What happened to the talk page of the article, why was it deleted? The article as it is, is a joke, it's not even a stub. But I believe Holly Body definitely is notible enough. There are not many awards in world of porn, there is no way you can use same notability criteria for porn actors and nonporn actors. There are people on wikipedia that are 1% (literally) as known as Holly Body. Also keep in mind, that she is a porn actor in decline. Her top popularity was long time ago. So can I vote for Delete only on basis that the article is not even a stub and nobody is showing desire to improve it? (or at least it seems so, that's why I asked about the Talk page) —Preceding unsigned comment added by JTrdi (talk • contribs) 01:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.