Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Deane-Johns


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 21:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Holly Deane-Johns

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:PERP, no long term notability. not the first nor last Australian to be convicted for drug trafficking. LibStar (talk) 07:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 08:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as above - fails WP:PERP as this person is not notable for anything other than this crime, and the crime itself is neither unusual nor noteworthy such that it is a well-documented historical event. Is also on the border of failing WP:BLP1E - Australians convicted of foreign drug trafficking are not perhaps entirely run-of-the-mill, but outside of death penalty cases they are not so noteworthy as to satisfy the 1E criteria. It is (mildly) interesting that the Federal Justice Minister would make a representation to his WA counterpart regarding a prisoner transfer, but that is more relevant to the David Johnston article than to this one. Euryalus (talk) 09:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - I have removed a bit of material as a consequence of links being broken. Given that there are three sources left that essentially deal with one event, as per nom I believe this article should be deleted. AlanS (talk) 10:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * This might not be much of an issue since the article is being considered for deletion and it may be a BLP issue, but a reminder: according to Link rot, "Do not merely delete cited information solely because the URL to the source does not work any longer." --Paul_012 (talk) 13:36, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I'd say my removal of the material had consensus since it occurred a week ago and no one's reverted. Aside from which, the material that was removed really didn't say a hell of lot more anyway. AlanS (talk) 09:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.