Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Hendrix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:06, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Holly Hendrix

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, interviews, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. The award categories listed - "Best New Starlet" and "Superslut" - are not significant. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:42, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WeAreAll Here  talk  16:51, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women -related deletion discussions. WeAreAll Here  <sub style="color:blue">talk  16:51, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 09:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - I consider that "AVN Award for Best New Starlet" satisfies WP: PORNBIO. Has this issue been discussed by the community? Of the 35 actresses who received the award, 33 are considered notable. This is a young article. If best referenced, i vote to be keep.Guilherme Burn (talk) 19:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Since we've reached the point that even a GayVN "Performer of the Year" can be deleted under similar circumstances, the community seems to have reached the point that the PORNBIO award criterion is virtually a dead letter, perhaps used only where coverage borders on the sufficient level. This isn't such a case. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 12:15, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet the general notability requirements.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete ... If only we could keep based on looks!, Unfortunately delete as nothing's coming up on Google. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.