Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Weber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep.  (non-admin closure).Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:24, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Holly Weber

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Uncredited actress in films and TV, only sources are IMDB profile and extra's own website - fails WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG. Created by a single purpose account AdventurousMe (talk) 04:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 04:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Although she may not meet WP:GNG as an actress, she sure does as a model. Almost every men magazine has an article about her. It's true that her article in Wikipedia is of a low quality and focuses on her acting career. The article should be more focused on her modeling career. The filmography section can stay because it is based on IMDB, and IMDB is taken as a reliable source for citing filmographies. --Λeternus (talk) 07:52, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Λeternus (talk) 07:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Λeternus (talk) 07:58, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment the IMDB profile is user-generated, by a single purpose account. The only item on the IMDB filmography is a film called Android Love, which appears to have been shown only at festivals: all her other roles appear to be uncredited. I think if the article is to stay it needs to be resourced to focus on her notability and achievements as a model - I'm not sure what the criteria are for notability as a glamour model - at the moment, it's a puff piece for a background artist / extra, and wildly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The filmography and TV-ography should be lost, unless there are reliable sources attesting to her uncredited roles. AdventurousMe (talk) 02:08, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I've started the reconstruction of the article. I removed the old text and replaced it with new information based on several sources, some of which are notable men magazines. Please have a look and reconsider your deletion proposal. --Λeternus (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It's a nice start, User:Aeternus. I'd suggest you verify whether any of these "guest appearances" were credited or as herself (or whether she was just an extra/background artist), and try and keep it to the stronger sources - I'd also like to see more on her career as a model, which I think is where her notability lies. But, yes, definitely looking a lot less deletable now. 14:11, 15 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdventurousMe (talk • contribs)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 16:06, 22 August 2014 (UTC)




 * Keep I think that Aeternus' edits have established that she's notable as a model. Dismas |(talk) 02:55, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep-it should mention that those are all uncredited also-otherwise it makes it sound like she had these major roles in those films (which I don't remember that actress in that is what tons of people would say). Wgolf (talk) 03:24, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Λeternus (talk) 08:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.