Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood Heartbreakers (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  07:01, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Hollywood Heartbreakers
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NFILM, no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG. Article is no more than a negligibly sourced castlist; no nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. Prior VFD/AFDs reached no consensus, with "keep" arguments resting on the now-deprecated standard that a porn film is notable if it includes multiple notable porn performers. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:35, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note. First nomination, at VFD, is reproduced on article's talk page. Prior AFD was apparently not correctly numbered. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:37, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I go to WP:PORN and see a list of reliable sources that review material of thiss sort. Obviously mainstream newspapers won't cover it.  The first site on the list has a review of it.  Another reliable source [] mentions its was reviewed in by Adam Film World and Hustler Erotic Video, both giving it a 3.  Not sure if either of those are notable though.  I find it unlikely you can have more than one notable porn star in something, without it getting reviews everywhere.  Just can't find all the old pornographic review magazines and whatnot archived on the internet from 26 years ago.   D r e a m Focus  04:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article does not meet WP:PORNBIO.--יום יפה (talk) 20:28, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - per WP:PORN.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:06, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.