Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood Reel Independent Film Festival


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Hollywood Reel Independent Film Festival

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Heavily advertorialized article about a film festival, not properly sourced as passing WP:NEVENT. As always, film festivals are not "inherently" notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on third-party reliable source coverage about the festival in media — but this is heavily reference-bombed almost entirely to primary and/or unreliable sourcing that isn't support for notability (the festival's own self-published content about itself on its main website, press release distribution platforms, Facebook posts, blogs, YouTube videos, etc.), with very little evidence of genuinely notability-building media coverage about it shown at all. Simply existing isn't automatically notable enough to exempt it from having to have much better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 19:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Events,  and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 19:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:35, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: It's been an event for over 20 years, i was hoping to find something in RS. This is the best I could find ; not strictly about the festival, but confirmation of it at least. Oaktree b (talk) 19:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep - Please see sources I added to External Links on the article. I had them listed here, but there is some Wikipedia dictate that won't allow sourcing listed at AFD. So check the External Links on the article. . — Maile  (talk) 03:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * These appear to be ... lists and press releases? &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 13:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - based on what I wrote here and per nom. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 20:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is no coverage in notable sources about the event, even what's been added to the external links section is PR or passing mentions. Oaktree b (talk) 13:10, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: The event seems notable but The entire article is sourced as self published references. Does not meet WP:SIGCOV for now. Macbeejack &#9742;  08:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.